Friday, June 26, 2009

Script Review – “Law-Abiding Citizen”

I knew what I wanted to say about Law Abiding Citizen long before I ever finished the story, probably in the mid-60-page region.

First, the script. I’m looking at a September, 2008, shooting draft by
Frank Darabont (previous revision by Kurt Wimmer). This script was also in the hands of Sheldon Turner and David Ayer. Apparently, the story has changed dramatically over the last few years. The version I have concerns Nick (Jamie Foxx), an assistant D.A. who must deal with a victim-turned-vigilante-but-actually-a-twisted-criminal-mastermind (Gerard Butler). His name's Clyde. He wreaks havoc on the entire city of Philadelphia all from inside his solitary jail cell. It brings to mind aspects of other films like Silence of the Lambs, The Dark Knight, and Shawshank Redemption (with a smattering of The Green Mile). Kind of intriguing, isn’t it? How does he do it? Once they get that hook into you, once he starts wreaking havoc from inside his jail cell, you have to read to the end to find out exactly how it was all done.

Darabont feels like the natural choice for this kind of material. He was set to direct the film, but rumor has it there was an ugly parting of ways between the director and committee of ten producers on this project. Yes, I said TEN producers. I don’t know the details, but dealing with ten producers sounds like a recipe for a nightmare. Now the film is being directed by
F. Gary Gray who gave us The Italian Job.

I’m not sure how well I can articulate this, but what bugs me about this story is that it has such potential for greatness and yet the filmmakers, which I’m sure includes a lot of interference from this bloated committee of producers, seems content to let this story flounder in the realm of marginally above grade B-movie thrills.

You have a man named Clyde, who, in the opening scenes, loses his wife and daughter to a pair of murdering bad guys. Loved it. Totally gripping. Then, he deals with Nick and some other attorneys. He’s infuriated that only one of the two bad guys will be prosecuted. The other will confess, testify against his accomplice, and in return, he’ll serve a minimum sentence. The other will get lethal injection.

Cut to about ten years later. It’s come time for the bad guy to get his lethal injection, which goes horrifyingly wrong in a scene almost reminiscent of the botched electrocution scene in The Green Mile. The other bad guy is also coincidentally butchered beyond recognition around the same time. Naturally, the cops pick-up Clyde who gives himself over willingly. While they have Clyde in jail, he starts making demands. Give me a comfy bed and I’ll confess to the murder. So they give him a bed and he confesses. Then he says, give me my iPod and I’ll confess to something else. And they do. And this goes on until he starts promising that he’s going to kill every man in the room.

And they do, indeed, start dying in very interesting ways.

Great setup. Loved it.

How Clyde accomplishes these amazing feats, I would not dream of revealing. Why he does these things, however, is a cause for a script review, because this is where I believe the script falters.

Clyde is obviously doing these things because he’s never gotten over the deaths of his wife and daughter. Perfectly understandable. He’s also doing these things to exact revenge onto those responsible for the murders and subsequent injustice that followed. Okay, I get that. He wants to stick it to a justice system that only half succeeded for him. In his scenes with Nick, though, he only goes so far as to impress upon him the pain of losing one’s family and the need to be angry about injustices and compromises with murderers.

Eh. That’s rather weak.

A mastermind would not need to sit inside a jail cell and wreak havoc on a city just to make those minor points about pain and anger. A mastermind would sit inside a jail cell and wreak havoc on the justice system to make points about the system’s inherent weaknesses. And this is the core of my concern: there needs to be something deeper and more meaningful here to warrant the telling of this story. You may recall that, in The Dark Knight, the Joker wasn’t just crazy and committing random acts of terror on the city. He was out to make a point to Batman about human nature. Remember what he said?

Their morals, their code... it's all a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. You'll see - I'll show you... when the chips are down, these civilized people... they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster... I'm just ahead of the curve.

That’s what this story is damn near crying out to be, what it’s missing: a deeper point that Clyde should be making about the justice system.

Halfway into this script, I wanted to just rewrite all of the dialogue. And then I realized that the dialogue is weak because the setup is weak. The setup is weak because Clyde’s motivations and reasons are weak. You need a higher purpose here, an ongoing conversation between Nick and Clyde as to whether one should have faith in the justice system or not just as Batman and Joker were having an ongoing discussion about human nature. And this debate begins when they talk about how one of those two murderers gets away and continues through his time in incarceration. In the end, Nick should triumph, the system is faulty but still good. As it is, this story regresses into a who-can-outhink-the-other-contest, which isn’t as satisfying.

Three more points:

1) At first, Clyde demands that he only speaks with Nick and relents when other lawyers insist on participating in the talks. Why make such demands if he’s only going to relent and nothing becomes of it? If Clyde can get them to put a bed in his cell, he can certainly force them into letting him talk to Nick and Nick alone. That’s what this story calls for, an evolving relationship between Nick and Clyde, just as you had an evolving relationship between Clarice and Hannibal Lecter. This should only be about Clyde and Nick, a contest of beliefs and wills. So when, say, Clyde makes demands about having records in his cell and someone other than Nick interrupts and answers that question for Nick, you’re undermining an opportunity to develop that relationship between protagonist and antagonist.

2) A note about Nick’s temperament. Nick is quick to go off the handle, to threaten Clyde, and leap over a table to strangle him, etc. That’s dangerous, because that could undermine audience support of the protag. They will respect and support more a man who can stay focused and keep his cool. But the test, the inner conflict, for Nick could be him keeping his cool when he wants so much to kill Clyde. And Clyde’s always prodding him and trying to push him over the edge. That could create a tension and a battle of wills between the two characters that would add layers to the dialogue and the scene. And of course, ultimately, Nick would be able to defeat Clyde because he kept his cool and didn’t fly off the emotional handle as Clyde did in seeking revenge. For me, amateurish screenwriting is very much like that, sudden extremes of obvious emotions in characters. But, over time, when a writer matures, I think you delve more into subtleties, layers, and subtext in the scenes. Because you know enough to ask yourself: “what would be more interesting - a guy who is disciplined in keeping his cool facing his ultimate challenge and watching him struggle to keep his cool throughout the conversation or a guy who flies off the handle whenever he’s pissed?” You know good and well that Clarice wanted to scream her head off in the dungeon with Hannibal, but she didn’t. She kept her cool, stayed focused on the case, and struggled through it. We could see her struggling and supported her for the difficulties she was going through.

3) It’s a bad decision that the Spook would make himself known to Nick and the team in order to pass along a bunch of verbal exposition. THEY should be the ones to find HIM.

To everyone’s credit, there’s a lot of great suspense and thrills. How the murders play out and how Clyde accomplishes these things are the elements that would impress some people who see the film. But this could’ve been so much better. And what would’ve made this story and this film a classic, something that would make people want to revisit this again and again and again, is a deeper point and an evolving relationship between the two main characters.

I can already hear the argument: “what the hell’s wrong with above average B-movie thrills?” I say fuck that. Shoot for the moon.



GabbaGoo said...

I actually read this script not to long ago... one of the better scripts I read actually... I loved some of the dialogue and hated other parts.

As far as your points... I agree with your first point, that script is begging for just them to be alone... I was saying the exact same thing... it was driving me nuts, because I kept waiting for it...

Point 2... Nicks aggression, now I'm not sure I agree or disagree here, I will spoil it here a little for people who have yet to read... Nick received that DVD of one of those murders and his daughter ended up watching it... so there was some cause for him to flip out a little, though they might have over done it a tee bit.

Point 3... I don't know, I sort of like how they played that little scene, and the whole "tie" convo they had... I'm sure audiences will laugh at the end of that scene.

And also... the ending, I have my doubts... but overall, I really didn't think it was a half bad script... although, I've been reading a lot of crappy ones.

Most likely will see the movie, just to see the audience reactions to certain parts.

Anonymous said...

"I can already hear the argument: “what the hell’s wrong with above average B-movie thrills?” I say fuck that. Shoot for the moon."

I love that.
For me, if you're writing something, and committing as much emotion and conflict and drama and tension and subtext and suspense as you can, that's the job. Anything else would be a soul-wounding waste of time. I wouldn't work on anything if I didn't think people would absolutely love that shit, or at least that I would love it. I wouldn't say anything to anyone about selling out - this is an industry as much as it's an art - but if you're going to half-ass it, why not half-ass something else; I want to watch movies like The Dark Knight, not Righteous Kill.
Can I get a "Hell yeah!"


Anonymous said...

I was so bowled over by Fahrenheit that I jumped right into this, another Darabont script, but I found it paled in comparison, and I gave up on it about a quarter way in. Hey, I write, my time is precious.

It had its merits and was clearly written by a professional, but I found it too obvious where everything was headed, I thought I could spot things a mile off.

Now, of course, I flipped through to read the last few pages and realised how wrong I was, that there had been some major reversals. But the lesson I took away from the script is that what comes before can't be a slave to a major reveal or reversal, it has to stand up to scrutiny in its own right.

If the plants and set-ups are too obvious, then a neat switcheroo won't exonerate what has seemed dully-predictable beforehand.

An audience should have to work for its red herrings.

Anonymous said...

Uhmm...I don't think anybody would "reek havoc", from a cell or not, unless they hadn't showered either. They might "wreck havoc", though.

Might wanna correct that, sir. Otherwise, good review.

Joshua James said...

I agree with your points, though for most of it I was totally with it, it read like a bullet for me ... for me the ending was a letdown of sorts (because, uh, cameras?) and that was the largest disappointment.

In terms of dialogue, it's hard to tell when so many writers and people have their thumbs in it, you know?

David Alan said...

Two things:

1) The beginning wasn't all that original. Stylized? Yes, but not very interesting. In fact, I would've liked it more had they started with the "IT'S MY BIRTHDAAAAAY!" scene. Very funny. And the story would've lost nothing.

2) This one is a bit nitpicky. But still, I think it pertains to bad logic and needs to be mentioned. From an off-the-books meeting behind the prison:

You should have, you know. Prosecuted both.

I’d have lost.

With your head held high. And without any blame from me.

That's fucking weak. Why? Nick's job is to look out for the best interests of everybody, not just Clyde. So yeah, why didn't he ask the 1 million dollar question- what happens if I lose and he kills someone else? What then, Clyde? That would've shown how flawed Clyde's logic was. It pissed me off that Nick wouldn't stand up for his decision.

So anyway, I wouldn't be worried about the producers. Look how well Lord of War turned out with all the producers on that film. Nah, I'm more worried about F. Gary Gray. This could pay huge dividends as long as he doesn't fuck it up. Even though it was bit predictable, I thought it was a very well told story. Even the "we sees" didn’t bother me as much here.

And for god's sake man, stop apologizing for working. Lol... it's good to see people like you getting work. I just hope you are playing as hard.

-- David Alan

martinb said...

I enjoyed the script until at some point it became a bit too much to believe and I lost interest.

jazzence said...

It'd be nice to provide the script so one could form an opinion, otherwise, there's not much room for participation.

Anonymous said...

jazzence - you can find the script (and lots of other spec scripts) on script shadow's blog:

Mystery Man said...

Hey guys, I’m SO sorry for my delay in responding. I’m trying to get caught up…

Gabba – On plot point 3, I loved the bit about the tie, as well. I just think THEY should have found HIM. I’ll probably go see it, too, for the same reason.

Mike – Hell, yeah! Hehehe…

Terraling – re: “what comes before can't be a slave to a major reveal or reversal, it has to stand up to scrutiny in its own right.” I loved that. I totally agree.

Anon – Thanks so much for that!

Josh – Hehehe… I totally agree.

David – There were a number of scenes where I thought the dialogue was weak and just wanted to rewrite it. Overall, the dialogue just didn’t work for me. Thanks, man. So sorry! Hehehe…

Martin – I felt the same way.

Jazzence – You can always send me an e-mail:

Terraling – That’s good to know. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

the ending. is pretty much how you can sum this this movie up. I've read another review which makes the comparison between this and silence of the lambs. this film falls very far from silence of the lambs greatness. you'd think if the antagonists character was a "brain" who's intellectual prowess makes him unbeatable, then we as an audience can just accept that as fact. making the film about a battle of wills and ideals, rather than an action flick based on proving how clever the 'up against the wall' protagonist can be.

so yes, if the ending was different, or more ambiguous it would have a greater, lasting impact.

Anonymous said...

the ending was very very disappointing. it just didn't tie the movie together. the movie was great and filled with suspense in every scene. then the last ten minutes were horrible.

Anonymous said...

I believe this script was an idea being worked out by a small time writer and it simply was such a good idea it went to the wrong hands. I saw a similar script over two years ago by an unknown writer in the movie biz. I can say that the ending was far better than this one by miles and miles.

Anonymous said...

china wholesale
cell phones
mobile phone
cheap cell phones wholesale
cosplay costumes
cheap cell phones
cheap cocktail dresses
Cheap Wedding Dresses
cheap jewelry

men's clothing said...

Your article is great,here i tell you some discount online stores
cheap polo shirts
Nike Tn
Men's Hoodies
Women's Hoodies
Men's Ralph Lauren
Women's Ralph Lauren
Burberry Polo Shirt
Moncler Down Jacket
Ralph Lauren Jacket
Ralph Lauren Coat
North Face Jacket
Columbia Jacket

cheap polo shirts
men's clothing
ralph lauren polo
columbia jackets

soz said...

mirc indir
sohbet odaları
cinsel sohbet
kamerali sohbet
cinsellik sohbet
mirc sohbet indir
sohbet indir
seviyeli sohbet
gay sohbet

will said...

Can I get some clarification on something? I read the Darabont rewrite and the beginning seems very different from the filmed version. The suspects don't speak, and the child is not raped.

I ask this because I am wondering when those choices were what point in the process?

I wonder about this because I was writing a similar script in a college class in early '09, which had almost an identical rape/murder scene to the one that was shot but not in the script. I also had the 'guy who did the killing flips on the non-killer for a deal' part, but I see that that's in the script.

I seem like a paranoid freak, right?

Well the only thing feeding my paranoia is that my act review partner for that script is a producer's assistant at Sony Pictures.

It's conceivable that he passed along my act 1 or the idea or whatever...

But, I don't really care about that. The rest of my script was completely different anyway.

However, part of what I thought made the script weak was the lack of motive in the section that copied my script (relax, just kidding...I doubt that ever happened).

For instance, in my script the 'Killer' has a motive to be killing the man's family (in his own mind), and the 2nd robber has a reason to be with the filthy killer (a debt, to be paid under the guise of a'robbery'...he doesn't know the 'killer's' real plan)and gives the D.A. a real reason to deal with him (blackmail).

So, next time a wacky professor and a wannabe hotshot studio development intern Teacher's aid give me crap about my setup, I guess I'll tell them to go call Frank Darabont.

nike said...

cheap ed hardy clothing
ed hardy clothing
ed hardy t shirts
ed hardy shirts
ed hardy men’s shirts
ed hardy boots
ed hardy shoes
ed hardy jeans
ed hardy handbags
ed hardy wallets
ed hardy women’s handbags
ed hardy sunglasses
ed hardy wholesale
ed hardy christian audigier
ed hardy hoodies
ed hardy jackets
ed hardy outerwear
ed hardy jacket
ed hardy swimwear
ed hardy love kills slowly
ed hardy sneakers
wholesale ed hardy shirts
ed hardy shirts for men
ed hardy shirts cheap
ed hardy t shirts for women

Anonymous said...

Buy Lariam

Anonymous said...

I like your blog. Thank you. They are really great .
Some new style Puma Cat shoes is in fashion this year.
The Nike Air Shoes is a best Air Shoes .
Nike Air Rift is good and

Cheap Nike Shoes
If you are a fans of Puma basket,we would offer the good

and Cheap Puma Shoes for you .the cheap ugg bootsis best christmas gift now.
The information age is really convenient .

jiaoliang said...

Teenagers in a track adidas shoes can go through shoes rate adidas outlet teenage runner well knows that adidas sneakers to wear the right shoes air jordan 2010 any cross country among world jordan shoes especially important to the sportsman discount jordan shoes a young person growing up Pure GHD Not only do they want to bourke dooney handbags grow out of their shoes dooney bourke bags but shape of their feet changes which means every time we dooney bourke outlet the time comes to get dooney bourke totes a new pair of shoes eveyone NIKE SHOX a good choice to get NIKE SHOX SHOES it with a high material SHOX SHOES that breathes easily on random moncler They should be extended runs moncler jackets give enough support to athlets moncler coats especially around the ankles area moncler vest to avoid injury your ankles discount moncler outlet when you make your trip discount moncler t-shirt something in store possible fit cheap ugg boots his is also the way to discount ugg boots that don't fit properly only ugg boots it focuses on your convenience classic ugg boots but they are not returnable ugg classic tall boots to move forward with quality discount ugg boots in the minds of the people classic ugg boots consumers all over the world ugg classic tall boots among public and new styles vibram five finger modern technology and best quality Five finger shoes all these efforts is consumers vibram 5 fingers for game and daily life vibram kso your daily life as well as vibram running shoes suitable for all category people

ahmet said...

Interesting Article. Hoping that you will continue posting an article having a useful information. Thanks a lot!
porno izle
gizli çekim sikiş
porno izle
porno izle
adult hikaye