Saturday, May 02, 2009

MM Returns on Monday!

Hey guys,

I finally have the chance to get back to blogging! I appreciate everyone’s patience. And I will most certainly respond to all of the e-mails. I spent the vast majority of April working on a film project that absolutely kicked my ass. In fact, for much of the month, I was writing scared. Have you ever done that? You’re writing for some titan of industry and you’re nervous as your fingers type the keypad from FADE IN all the way to FADE OUT? That’s when you really discover what you’re made of. That’s when you go “oh shit, I’ve got to really deliver the goods.” So you dive in and use every trick you know, everything you’ve studied your whole life, from
depth to subtext to exposition, and hopefully, you make all the right decisions.

I’ll be back on Monday with a big script review of Fahrenheit 451.

I’m also in the
latest issue of Script Magazine with a big discussion about unsympathetic protagonists. Here’s a taste:

Say, has anyone ever heard of Scrooge? He has a transformational arc, does he not? He must be completely unsympathetic before he can transform, right? How are you going to tell a story about a man who has a transformational arc if he’s sympathetic from the start?

I’m also reminded of a great article by Terry Rossio on his Wordplayer website called One Hundred Million Dollar Mistakes. He wrote, “On Shrek, we were insistent that the story had to be about an ogre who was happy the way he was -- if the world rejected him, then he would reject the world. It was about putting up emotional barriers as an inappropriate reaction to rejection. Surrounding Shrek, all the main characters were dealing with similar inappropriate reactions to issues of self-worth, exploring all faces of the theme, and giving the film a sense of unity. At one point, the production team decided to throw that out and explore the notion that Shrek's real problem was that he wanted to be a Knight, so people would like him (we called this the 'woe is me' or Hunchback version of the story). That change screwed everything up, and you could see a hundred million $1 bills flying out the window. Happily, the production team, after seven months of brutally hard work, abandoned the 'woe is me' approach and came back to the emotional barrier theme. Now of course nobody can see the film any other way. Essential battle won, and the One Hundred Million Dollar Mistake narrowly avoided!”

The “I want to be a Knight” idea makes me want to heave. This over-zealous pursuit of sympathy in a protagonist has lead to so many cornball ideas. Good lessons get lost and bad films get made because preposterous concepts get shoved down our throats all in the name of sympathetic protagonists with goals we can root for. History has proven time and again that audiences can deal with an unsympathetic protagonist in the context of a good story. Audiences are good people. They will watch mean characters like Walt Kowalski or Shrek or Scrooge, because they will quietly hope for them to change for the better and discover the good in life.



Christina said...

I figured you were deep in a project. I could almost hear the gears grinding away through the internets. Hope all is well!!

Sabina E. said...

welcome back. I, too, was wondering where the hell you went. I prefer the "anti-hero" protagonist like Shrek anytime, anyday over a fake, slap-happy protagonist anyway.

Kwinnky said...

You were greatly missed.

GabbaGoo said...


Ryan said...

Great to have you back. Good job on your article, too. I enjoyed it and I want to mix my protag with some unsympathic characteristics now.

Here's my question about it. Why do "pro-readers" turn specs away with unsympathetic protags??? I'm so lost on this and shouldn't we write what "Hollywood" wants to hear??? Even though 90% of what they want to hear is shiz. I hear about more crappy specs being sold than anything else.

This is a F-ed up industry...

Salva Rubio said...

So cool you're back. I am MIA myself, writing a tv-series for a well-known kiddie channel. Will keep reading you, though!

Mystery Man said...

Thanks, guys. I made a mistake. The Terry Rossio paragraph had been cut. Hey, you get to read a cut paragraph! Woo hoo!

Ryan - They're Formula Freaks, that's why.


Joshua James said...

Wahooo! Our man is back!

Anonymous said...

thought the swine flu had gotten you.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad to hear even YOU get that "kicked my ass" feeling from a project, even with all of your screenwriting experience. I'm feeling pretty beat up myself right now. Although...come to think of it, that's not such great news to hear you can still feel that way even when you're not a newbie...

Mystery Man said...

Anon - Bwaah ha ha ha! If I ever get the chills, I'll just drink some Scotch. That'll kick it right out.

Barb - Hey, with some franchises and or some directors, the pressure to deliver is crushing.

Nice to meet you.


Eric M said...

Great post.

To not be polite, the Truffaut film is a giant piece of 1960s art house poo.

Mystery Man said...

Eric - Thanks so much, man. "Art house poo..." Yup. Hehehe...


Anonymous said...

china wholesale
cell phones
mobile phone
cheap cell phones wholesale
cosplay costumes
cheap cell phones
cheap cocktail dresses
Cheap Wedding Dresses
cheap jewelry

men's clothing said...

Your article is great,here i tell you some discount online stores
cheap polo shirts
Nike Tn
Men's Hoodies
Women's Hoodies
Men's Ralph Lauren
Women's Ralph Lauren
Burberry Polo Shirt
Moncler Down Jacket
Ralph Lauren Jacket
Ralph Lauren Coat
North Face Jacket
Columbia Jacket

cheap polo shirts
men's clothing
ralph lauren polo
columbia jackets

soz said...

mirc indir
sohbet odaları
cinsel sohbet
kamerali sohbet
cinsellik sohbet
mirc sohbet indir
sohbet indir
seviyeli sohbet
gay sohbet

Anonymous said...


Mynet Sohbet
Mynet Sohbet

kiralık bobcat
kiralık bobcat
kiralık bobcat
bobcat kiralama
kiralık 1cx
kiralık 1cx

satılık bobcat
satılık bobcat
satılık bobcat

kiralık bobcat
bobcat Kiralama
kiralık 1cx
kiralık kato
kiralık kompresör